Family Law Hub

Bruzas v Saxton [2018] EWHC 1619 (Fam)

In a tweet: Whistleblower deliberately sends privileged documents to the court. What next?

This content is only available to members

If you are a current member log on now.

If you are not a member contact Class Legal on 01652 652222 or email them via info@classlegal.com to get started.

Case note, published: 06/08/2018

Topics

See also

  • Judgment concerning whether documents leaked to a judge by a possible whistleblower working for a firm in financial remedy proceedings are protected by legal professional privilege. Holman J directed that the matter be listed before The President for determination. Judgment, 27/06/2018, free

Published: 06/08/2018

Copyright 

Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.

Disclaimer

The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item