Family Law Hub

Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66

Judgment, published: 03/09/2001

Items referring to this

  • The issue on this appeal was how to satisfy the equity raised by a daughter against her parents, who were farmers, by virtue of the principles of proprietary estoppel. The parents were appealing an award of £1.3 - the appeal was allowed and the award reduced to £500,000. Judgment, 20/05/2016, free
  • In a tweet: Whether daughter entitled to dairy farm following detrimental reliance on late father's assurances Judgment, 11/04/2018, free
  • Cohabitation case where the judge dismissed the claimant's claim to be a beneficiary of a constructive trust, but upheld her alternative claim to an enforceable equity by operation of proprietary estoppel, ordering the appellant to pay her £28,500. The appellant's appeal against that ruling was dismissed. Judgment, 17/10/2014, free
  • Judgment, 03/06/2012, free
  • The question in this case was whether a proprietory estoppel operated in favour of the claimant son such as to give him an interest in the family farm and, if so, what interest. The judge held that the son made out his case. Judgment, 06/06/2018, free

Published: 03/09/2001

Copyright 

Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.

Disclaimer

The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item