Family Law Hub


Latest updates

  • In brief: The ECtHR found that the father (“F”) had been able to present his case fully to the domestic courts and that the courts’ reasons for their decision not to order that his child live with him had been relevant and sufficient. In particular, it was not convinced by F’s argument that the judge in his case had believed that small children should always be raised by their mothers. It did not find any violations of his rights under the Convention. Judgment, 15/05/2018, free
  • The Supreme Court of Cassation, Bulgaria, requested a preliminary ruling from the ECJ regarding whether "rights of access" in Article 1(2)(a) and Article 2(10) of Brussels II Revised (BIIR) include the rights of access of grandparents to their grandchildren. Although the ultimate decision is still awaited, Advocate General Szpunar has recommended that the ECJ should rule that rights of access under BIIR extend to individuals other than parents, if those individuals have family ties to the child based on law or fact (in this case a grandmother). His opinion emphasises that the best interests of the child is the primary principle underpinning BIIR and should guide analysis of its interpretation. Judgment, 15/05/2018, free
  • In brief: A mother’s (“M”) unsuccessful appeal against a decision transferring the residence of the six-year old child to the father (“F”) as a result of M not supporting contact between F and C. Judgment, 28/03/2018, free
  • In brief: An interim hearing in a case involving a father’s (“F”) application to resume contact with his two children, where domestic abuse formed the backdrop. An emphasis was put on the court’s need not to prematurely stop contact but to investigate the ways in which the family could be supported. Judgment, 09/03/2018, free
  • Appeal by the same sex parents of the child against a child arrangements order which provided for the sperm donor's parents to have contact with the child. Appeal dismissed. Judgment, 01/03/2018, free

Latest know-how

Latest training

  • 10 questions on the various cases summarised in the July 2017 Family Law Hub Digest CPD course, 25/08/2017, members only
  • Recording of webinar broadcast live on 23 February 2017. Webcast, 02/03/2017, members only
  • 12 questions to accompany Charlotte Trace's lecture on s8 and 11 CA applications CPD course, 06/09/2016, members only
  • In this webcast, which was recorded on 1 September 2016, Charlotte Trace, barrister at 29 Bedford Row, takes us through how to make private law Children Act applications, principally applications under section 8 of the Act (namely for contact, residence, specific issue and prohibited steps orders) and applications under section 11 for contact activity directions and conditions, and for enforcement. Webcast, 02/09/2016, members only
  • Piers Pressdee QC of 29 Bedford Row reviews the major developments within the private children law field in the last year. He focusses on the case-law, identifying the key decisions and seeking to set that case-law within context. Webcast, 24/02/2016, members only

Latest sources


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item