Family Law Hub

Mediation Task Force wants MoJ to pay for MIAMS

Task Force set up to examine drop in MIAMS referrals publishes its report.

  • The Mediation Task Force, chaired by Sir David Norgrove, has recommended that the MoJ funds all MIAMS for the next 12 months. 

    The Task Force was set up to examine the unexpected drop in MIAMS following implementation of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 which in their words resulted in "loss of a major referral mechanism from legal aid lawyers to mediators". 

    That change has already seen several mediators go out of business and the Task Force notes that 

    "there may be a lack of capacity if and when the number of mediations begins to increase, which may result from the requirement introduced in April 2014 that most applicants to court should first have attended a MIAM to consider mediation"

    They believe that getting the MoJ to pay for MIAMS for 12 months would

    "make a real impact on the take-up of mediation and would increase understanding and awareness of the process at a time when this is a major barrier. It would show attentive response to feedback from the mediation sector while having a contained cost."

    The report also sets out several other policy recommendations to try and breathe life into the provision of MIAMS:

    • the MoJ should undertake a sustained low level campaign to increase awareness
    • consulting with the Family Procedure Rule Committee to revise the unhelpful and archaic use of language in court forms and guidance (with particular reference to the divorce petition)
    • abolishing fault based divorce
    • increasing the fee paid to mediators for MIAMs for a fixed period of three years
    • the LAA should fund the non-legally aided person for the first single session mediation for a period of three years and consider waiving the second eligibility test so that the initial eligibility test would continue to be valid for six weeks following initial checks by the mediator
    • that mediation should be an exempt service for the purposes of the newly introduced Residence Test
    • consideration should be given to a capital disregard for mediation cases
    • that the Law Society and the SRA should be allowed to consider whether regulations could enable solicitors to see both parties together where they want that, for example when they have mediated

    The full report can be found here (pdf)

News, published: 04/07/2014


Items referring to this

Published: 04/07/2014


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item