Family Law Hub

President's circular: Financial Remedies Courts

Circular released by the President on 1 December 2017 in which he proposes to pilot the FRC in three places starting in February 2018

  • The need for and the many benefits to be derived from the introduction of a national system of Financial Remedies Courts have been persuasively argued by HHJ Martin O'Dwyer, HHJ Edward Hess and Joanna Miles: Hess and Miles, The recognition of money work as a speciality in the family courts by the creation of a national network of Financial Remedies Units [2016] Fam Law 1335, and O'Dwyer, Hess and Miles, Financial Remedies Courts [2017] Fam Law 625. I have made clear my support for this: Note by the President [2016] Fam Law 1340, and 17th View from the President's Chambers: divorce and money – where are we and where are we going? [2017] Fam Law 607.

    Following discussions with HMCTS, I am proposing to pilot the Financial Remedies Court (FRC) concept in three places, starting, I hope, in February 2018: London, the West Midlands and South-East Wales. I envisage that further pilots will follow quite shortly on a rolling programme.

    The basic concept, which builds on both the Family Court and regionalised Court of Protection models, is as follows (please note that the terminology is not yet finalised):

    • A number of regional hubs, typically two per circuit (population or geography may require more), at which both the administration (HMCTS) and the judicial leadership for the relevant hub area are based.
    • A lead judge for each hub area: this must be a judge (either a CJ or perhaps a DJ) with real experience / expertise in financial remedy work.
    • A national lead judge with a deputy. Mostyn J and, as his deputy, HHJ Hess have agreed to fill these important positions.
    • Hearings will be conducted (a) at the regional hub and (I emphasise this, because it is very important) also (b) at a number of Financial Remedies Hearing Centres (FRHCs) within the hub area.
    • Initially the FRC will deal with ancillary relief cases; in due course, this will be extended to all financial remedy cases dealt with in the Family Court or Family Division.
    • Only 'ticketed' judges will sit in the FRC. All DJs and CJs currently in post who do this work will be 'grandfathered' in.
    • The FRC will function quite separately from the Regional Divorce Centres: initially in accordance with the current principles regulating 'administrative de-linking', pending full 'legal de-linking'.
    • Initially, the FRC will function with paper files, as at present, but HMCTS, with my support, is already working on transition by the FRC to a fully digitised model. 

    It follows from this that three critical issues relate to:

    • The location of the proposed FRC hubs.
    • The locations of the proposed FRHCs.
    • The selection of the lead judge for each FRC hub.

    In relation to the three pilots, local discussions on these matters are under way. Thought is also being given to where and when the next wave of pilots should begin. 

    I have kept the Association of District Judges aware of my thinking.

    James Munby, President of the Family Division

News, published: 01/12/2017


Items referring to this

Published: 01/12/2017


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item