Family Law Hub

Pensions Advisory Group publishes long-awaited reports

Two reports published for consultation covering the legal issues of pensions on divorce and the use of valuation and experts.

  • The Pensions Advisory Group has published two reports on the legal issues of pensions on divorce and valuation and experts in such cases.

    They are now looking for responses from the profession by 18th July along the lines below. The text is from the Group Chairs, Mr Justice Francis and HHJ Hess:

    We are now pleased to confirm that the Pension Advisory Group's two draft reports are available via this link

    We are seeking to consult as widely as possible on the two reports. The first report reviews legal questions, including how s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 operates in this context and when to instruct an expert. The second reviews the assumptions used by experts when valuing pensions for the purposes of sharing or offsetting, and any desirable qualifications and regulation of the experts. The reports are necessarily long, reflecting in part the complex subject matter, but also demonstrating the reasoning behind our recommendations, both where we have been able to reach agreement and where we have not. 

    We are now seeking your input in responding to the consultation questions. You will find these summarised at the beginning of the Legal report, and at the beginning of, and embedded within, the Valuation and Expert Issues report. If you do not have the time or inclination to read both reports from beginning to end, please just read the sections and respond to the consultation questions which interest you. Please email your replies to Hilary Woodward at by 18 July 2018 using the attached reply and consent form. 

    All replies will be considered by the PAG to assist in the preparation of a good practice guide for the judiciary and practitioners specialising in this field, with a target date for on line publication towards the end of 2018. There will then follow another guide for non-specialists and the divorcing public. 

    Participation in this consultation is entirely voluntary. We will use your responses to better understand the issues facing the professions and to inform the guidance that we publish. We will not be publishing the responses themselves or any part of them, but we may, if you agree, publish a list of those who responded to the consultation exercise. When you provide your consultation response, please be kind enough to use the attached reply form. Data will only be collected once you press the send button and it will then be securely stored in accordance with The Data Protection Act and GDPR for a maximum of two years. 

    This is your opportunity to draw on the experience of a very eminent and hard-working group of professionals who practice in the challenging field of pensions on divorce, and to have your say. This opportunity is unlikely to arise again in the near future. Please respond! And if you know of anyone else who might be interested to read and respond to the reports, please feel free to forward this email to them.

    Kind regards,

    Mr Justice Francis and HHJ Edward Hess.

    You can read more on the work of the Group here.

News, published: 19/04/2018


Published: 19/04/2018


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item