In a tweet: Names of the respondents made public in an attempt to shame them into returning children who had been removed from the jurisdiction in breach of a shared live with order.
This content is only available to members
If you are a current member log on now.
If you are not a member contact Class Legal on 01652 652222 or email them via info@classlegal.com to get started.
Case note, published: 04/11/2019
Topics
See also
- Applications were made to redact a previous judgment concerning international child abduction, on the basis that criminal charges might be brought. Mostyn J said that such redactions would rob the judgment of the coercive effect that it was designed to achieve, and no decision to charge had yet been made. The applications were rejected. Judgment, 29/04/2019, free
Published: 04/11/2019
Share