Family Law Hub

M v G (Hague Convention: Article 13(b) defence) [2020] EWHC 1450 (Fam)

The four-year-old son had come from Australia with the mother to visit her family in the United Kingdom, with the father's consent. They did not return, and so the father made a Hague Convention application. The parties agreed that the son had been habitually resident in Australia at the relevant time. The mother relied on the defence under Article 13(b). While Theis J did not doubt that if the mother returned with the son she was likely to suffer in the way described by the doctor consulted, given the chronic nature of her psychological difficulties, that did not, in her judgment, in the circumstances of this case, meet the threshold in Article 13(b). Theis J was satisfied that the protective measures agreed by the parties would be able to mitigate any harm. She ordered that the child be returned to Australia, on a date to be fixed.

Judgment, published: 26/10/2020


Published: 26/10/2020


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item