Family Law Hub

Lloyds Investment (Scandinavia) Ltd v Ager Handerssen [2003] EWHC 1740 (Ch)

Judgment, published: 26/07/2003

Items referring to this

  • Judgment, 18/07/2012, free
  • Application by the H for permission to appeal decisions which (i) refused H's application for permission to appeal out of time against an ancillary relief order dated 26 May 2006; and (ii) refused H's application to set aside that order on grounds of material non-disclosure. Application refused. Judgment, 08/08/2013, free
  • Judgment, 03/02/2013, free
  • The child was the subject of proceedings in England and Spain. The English court had declared that she was habitually resident in the UK and made other consequential directions. The Spanish court had refused to return her to this jurisdiction pursuant to the Hague Convention. M's application was to set aside declarations made by the English Court as to (i) habitual residence (ii) wrongful retention. Alternatively she invited the court to reassess habitual residence as at today's date. Judgment, 10/03/2014, free

Published: 26/07/2003


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item