Judgment, published: 25/04/1999
Items referring to this
- Mother applied for orders including a child arrangements order (that the children live with her and that there is no contact ordered with Father), a specific issue order (that the children are to be known by different names), a prohibited steps order and a s91 (14) order (restricting Father from making further applications to the court). Judgment, 28/07/2016, free
- Judgment concerning, among other things, the mother's application to be able to rename her children without reference to the father, who lives in Iran, and to restrict the father's parental responsibility. Judgment, 12/12/2017, free
- Applications by two men (who were in a committed relationship and where one of them was the biological father of the child who had been born as the result of artificial or assisted conception), for parental responsibility and for residence and contact; and cross-applications by the mother for residence and contact. The judge decided that the two men should have PR for the child. Judgment, 05/05/2015, free
- A case involving the change of a child's name. Case note, 27/09/2013, members only
- Mother's appeal against an order that the child's name be changed so that his middle name was that of his father. The appeal was allowed to the limited extent that the decision should be made again, on the basis that the judge had not applied the right test. Judgment, 19/11/2013, free
- Application by M for permission to appeal against an order setting out arrangements for contact between the children and F, and directing the mother to add F's first name as one of the children's second middle name. Application granted in part. Judgment, 26/06/2013, free
Published: 25/04/1999
Share