Family Law Hub

Tanfern v Macdonald [2000] EWCA Civ 3023

Judgment, published: 31/12/2000

Items referring to this

  • Application made by firm of solicitors acting for the husband in financial remedy proceedings, for permission to appeal an order in which the DJ set aside a charge on the FMH to cover the husbands costs. The wife had secured 2 restrictions against the property and the DJ was satisfied that the husband had, at least as one of his purposes, executed the charge so as to defeat the wife's claim rather than use his offshore funds to pay his costs. The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the firm did not have actual notice but did have constructive notice of the intention of the husband to defeat the wife's claim. Judgment, 20/04/2015, free
  • In a tweet: Court has power to order sale of property to one beneficiary Judgment, 06/08/2018, free
  • Application by husband for permission to appeal financial remedy order. Application granted. Judgment, 19/05/2013, free
  • Husband's application for permission to appeal an order which dismissed his application for financial provision after he had refused an offer from the wife resulting in excessive costs being incurred by her. Application refused. Judgment, 18/12/2014, free
  • Appeal against a finding that the divorced ex-partner of the deceased and the estate of the deceased himself were entitled to half each of the beneficial interest in a property. Appeal also against a costs order. First appeal dismissed and the costs order allowed. Judgment, 01/05/2018, free

Published: 31/12/2000

Copyright 

Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.

Disclaimer

The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item