Family Law Hub

Judgment, published: 27/02/1997

Items referring to this

• AAZ v BBZ and others [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam)
  Judgment in financial remedy proceedings in very high net worth case involving offshore trusts and international enforcement. The wife was awarded £453m, which represented 41.5% of the assets. Judgment, 11/05/2017, free
• AP v ALP [2018] EWHC 2758 (Fam)
  In brief: Finding that the pot of liquid assets totalled £14.9million, that the pot of Russian business assets totalled £5.7million and that the husband (“H”) had not wilfully dissipated assets nor hidden assets, Mr Justice Moor awarded the wife (“W”) £9.6million with the husband (“H”) retaining £12.9million. Wells-sharing of the Russian business assets was considered to be entirely inappropriate, and H keeping the business assets would allow him to be provided with an income and a return of his capital in the long term. His housing needs were also met plus he had monies to clear his significant debts (£2.8million). W took all the non-Russian liquid assets plus received an indemnity in relation to French tax liabilities and £20,000 a year in child maintenance and a school fees/education costs order. Judgment, 22/10/2018, free
• CG v IF (inter-relationship: Pt III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 and Lugano Convention) [2010] EWHC 1062 (Fam)
  Case note, 12/05/2010, members only
• DB v PB [2016] EWHC 3431 (Fam)
  In a tweet: Achieving fairness in the face of an unfair PNA and where EU Maintenance Reg ties the English courts hands Case note, 02/02/2017, members only
• Johnson v Takieddine & Anor [2016] EWHC 1895 (Fam)
  Judgment determining an application made by a former wife under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 and an application by her for the enforcement, by way of a charging order, of a capitalised maintenance order made by a French Court. Judgment, 02/02/2017, free
• Johnson v Takieddine & Anor [2016] EWHC 1895 (Fam)
  In a tweet: Part III MFPA 1984 order made reflecting French court's decision that marital wealth is to be shared equally Case note, 02/02/2017, members only
• Kremen v Agrest (No.11) (Financial Remedy: Non-Disclosure: Post-Nuptial Agreement) [2012] EWHC 45 (Fam)
  Judgment, 19/01/2012, free
• Mantegazza v Mantegazza [2017] EWHC 3811 (Fam)
  Application by the husband for a stay of divorce proceedings started by the wife in England where he wanted the proceedings to be held in Switzerland. The application was granted. Judgment, 09/07/2018, free
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42
  Judgment, 20/10/2010, free
• Re T v T (Occupation orders, Brussels I and Protective Measures) [2010] EWHC 3776 (Fam)
  Case note, 21/12/2010, members only
• Traversa v Freddi [2011] EWCA Civ 81
  Judgment, 14/02/2011, free