Latest updates
- A financial remedy application made by a husband against his wife, the great-granddaughter of the founder of Avon Products, Inc. The Judge, Mr Justice Mostyn, had to determine if the capital from the family trust was available to the wife and was the pre-nuptial agreement void? He found that the money was available to the wife and that the agreement was invalid. He awarded the husband £1,333,500 to meet his needs. Judgment, 11/04/2019, free
- In financial remedy proceedings, the husband was trying to thwart the wife's claim by asserting that the business and the properties were owned by his mother, in a situation where the true owners had been camouflaged. In virtually every case the actual facts would determine the real ownership of a piece of property, and an enquiry into real ownership would consider the intentions of the relevant actors. Conveyancers were urged to record how the beneficial interest is to be held. Mostyn J found that the business and properties were owned 50:50 by the husband and wife. Judgment, 27/03/2019, free
- Widow's out of time application under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 in circumstances where provision for her had been made by way of 2 trusts. The application was refused. Judgment, 05/03/2019, free
- In this long running case in which the husband (who was described by Mr Justice Mostyn as 'dishonest, manipulative, arrogant, menacing and contemptuous of the court's authority') had failed to disclose financial information related to a trust, a periodical payments order was made in favour of the wife and her capital claims were adjourned. Judgment, 21/12/2018, free
- In a tweet: Court has power to order sale of property to one beneficiary Judgment, 06/08/2018, free
Latest know-how
- In a tweet: Court has power to order sale of property to one beneficiary Case note, 06/08/2018, members only
- Practice Note reproduced from the Dictionary of Financial Remedies 2018. See more here: https://classlegal.com/books/dictionary-of-financial-remedies Practice note, 01/05/2018, members only
- In a tweet: FR judgment was to be published un-anonymised where H's conduct had been dishonest Case note, 11/04/2018, members only
- In a tweet: Despite H's bad behaviour, the award was based on W and child's needs Case note, 11/04/2018, members only
- In a tweet: H's line of defence? He was so completely and utterly untrustworthy Case note, 11/04/2018, members only
Latest training
- Questions to accompany the webcast first broadcast in June 2016 CPD course, 06/07/2016, members only
- Notes for Christopher Wagstaffe QC's talk presented at the At A Glance Conference 2016 Training note, 23/06/2016, members only
- 6 questions on the Supreme Court case of Petrodel v Prest CPD course, 24/06/2013, members only
- Watch the recorded webinar broadcast on 12 June tackling the Supreme Court decision in Prest v Petrodel Webcast, 13/06/2013, members only
- CPD course, 03/05/2012, registration required
Latest sources
- Statute (external), 31/12/1925, free
Documentation
Using the Hub
Searching
Notices
T&Cs
Privacy
Legal Materials Copyright Statement & Disclaimer
Find out More
What's on the Hub
What's included in your membership
About Us
Contact Us
Stay up to date
Read about our free email alerts
Sign up here
Share