Latest updates
- In a tweet: Damages and injunctions in deceit, harassment and privacy breach claims Judgment, 11/04/2018, free
- In a tweet: Non-mol order can be made to supplement an injunction made under inherent jurisdiction Judgment, 19/01/2018, free
- Reminder that applications for freezing orders must be made to the Family Court at district judge level, unless the criteria in the Efficiency Statement justify it being heard at High Court judge level. The criteria in this case were not met, because, in effect, the applicant had already frozen the property by the imposition of his home rights charge. Judgment, 01/08/2017, free
- Substantive return date for the court's consideration of freezing and asset preservation orders obtained by the wife in respect of companies where the husband was the sole director and shareholder. The hearing was adjourned while a valuation of the companies was completed. Judgment, 08/03/2016, free
- H had obtained a freezing injunction to prevent W and their son from carrying out their duties as directors of 2 companies. The application was urgent because the H had evidence that included an attempt by W and the son "to obtain immediate access to, and control of, company bank accounts [which] had to be viewed in the context of the earlier attempt to hide £12 million of matrimonial funds". The court refused a continuation of the freezing order, instead holding that a 'moratorium agreement' should continue, on the basis that W and son give formal undertakings to the court. Judgment, 16/10/2015, free
Latest know-how
- Practice Note reproduced from the Dictionary of Financial Remedies 2018. See more here: https://classlegal.com/books/dictionary-of-financial-remedies Practice note, 01/05/2018, members only
- In a tweet: Damages and injunctions in deceit, harassment and privacy breach claims Case note, 11/04/2018, members only
- In a tweet: FC guidance on types of freezing injunction application that should be heard by HCJ sitting in FC Case note, 04/08/2017, members only
- In a tweet: HC refuses W's application for interim relief in support of overseas proceedings Case note, 14/09/2016, members only
- Here, a wife ("W") unsuccessfully argued that a world-wide freezing injunction against her should be discharged on the grounds of material non-disclosure. Case note, 24/06/2015, members only
Latest training
- Six questions, worth an hour of CPD, on the cases of W v W [2012] EWHC 2469 (Fam), T v T [2012] EWHC 3462 (Fam) and TC & JC (Children: Relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam), which were published in February 2013. CPD course, 05/03/2013, members only
Latest sources
- Form (external), 01/12/2005, free
Documentation
Using the Hub
Searching
Notices
T&Cs
Privacy
Legal Materials Copyright Statement & Disclaimer
Find out More
What's on the Hub
What's included in your membership
About Us
Contact Us
Stay up to date
Read about our free email alerts
Sign up here
Share