Injunctions

AEY v AL (Family Proceedings: Civil Restraint Order) [2018] EWHC 3253 (Fam)
The father's applications in relation to contact with his daughters were dismissed and an extended civil restraint order was imposed on him. Judgment, 28/11/2018, free
AXB v BXA [2018] EWHC 588 (QB)
In a tweet: Damages and injunctions in deceit, harassment and privacy breach claims Judgment, 11/04/2018, free
T (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1889
In a tweet: Non-mol order can be made to supplement an injunction made under inherent jurisdiction Judgment, 19/01/2018, free
Tobias v Tobias [2017] EWFC 46
Reminder that applications for freezing orders must be made to the Family Court at district judge level, unless the criteria in the Efficiency Statement justify it being heard at High Court judge level. The criteria in this case were not met, because, in effect, the applicant had already frozen the property by the imposition of his home rights charge. Judgment, 01/08/2017, free
Kanev-Lipinski v Aharon Lipinski & Ors [2016] EWHC 475 (QB)
Substantive return date for the court's consideration of freezing and asset preservation orders obtained by the wife in respect of companies where the husband was the sole director and shareholder. The hearing was adjourned while a valuation of the companies was completed. Judgment, 08/03/2016, free

Freezing Injunctions
Practice Note reproduced from the Dictionary of Financial Remedies 2018. See more here: https://classlegal.com/books/dictionary-of-financial-remedies Practice note, 01/05/2018, members only
AXB v BXA [2018] EWHC 588 (QB)
In a tweet: Damages and injunctions in deceit, harassment and privacy breach claims Case note, 11/04/2018, members only
Tobias v Tobias [2017] EWFC 46
In a tweet: FC guidance on types of freezing injunction application that should be heard by HCJ sitting in FC Case note, 04/08/2017, members only
Kanev-Lipinski v Aharon Lipinski & Ors [2016] EWHC 475 (QB)
In a tweet: HC refuses W's application for interim relief in support of overseas proceedings Case note, 14/09/2016, members only
Bataillon & Anor v Shone & Anor QBD
Here, a wife ("W") unsuccessfully argued that a world-wide freezing injunction against her should be discharged on the grounds of material non-disclosure. Case note, 24/06/2015, members only

February 2013 Cases Update
Six questions, worth an hour of CPD, on the cases of W v W [2012] EWHC 2469 (Fam), T v T [2012] EWHC 3462 (Fam) and TC & JC (Children: Relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam), which were published in February 2013. CPD course, 05/03/2013, members only

Documentation

Using the Hub
Searching

Notices
T&Cs
Privacy
Legal Materials Copyright Statement & Disclaimer

Find out More
What's on the Hub
What's included in your membership
About Us
Contact Us

Stay up to date
Read about our free email alerts
Sign up here

Family Law Hub