- Everything (1370)
- Model letter (0)
- Practice note (17)
- Precedent (2)
- Uploads (0)
- Tools (0)
- Article (6)
- Case note (335)
- News (225)
- Polls (0)
- CPD course (0)
- CPD diploma (0)
- Training note (0)
- Webinar (48)
- Downloads (0)
- Form (47)
- Judgment (551)
- Practice direction (7)
- Rule (0)
- SI (0)
- Statute (0)
- International regs (0)
- In this case HHJ Hess (‘the judge’) considered an application for the variation of a pension sharing order. Case note, 18/11/2021, free
- In this case Peel J (‘the judge’) dealt with the final hearing in an application by Caroline Crowther (‘W’) for financial remedies following her divorce from Paul Crowther (‘H’). Case note, 05/11/2021, free
- In this case Sir Jonathan Cohen (‘the judge’) had to determine the ambit of the applicant wife’s (‘W’) claims for financial remedy orders. Specifically, this concerned whether the English court had jurisdiction to determine W’s maintenance claim, given the effect of Council Regulation (EC) 4/2009 (‘the Maintenance Regulation’). Case note, 07/10/2021, free
- Case note, 01/07/2021, free
- Case note, 22/04/2021, free
- Listed before Mostyn J for final disposal was an application for maintenance under s.27 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (“MCA 1973”) made by the wife (“W”), along with a Judgment Summons issued by W, and an application made by the husband (“H”) to set aside, or stay enforcement of, an interim order for maintenance and legal services provision. This judgment follows the judgment of the Supreme Court from July 2020, Villiers v Villiers [2020] UKSC 30. A summary of that judgment can be found here. Case note, 19/03/2021, free
- Lieven J considered an appeal made against a decision not to exercise the Thwaite jurisdiction. Case note, 11/03/2021, free
- Cohen J heard applications made by both husband and wife following the handing down of judgment after a final hearing between the parties in March 2020. He gave two separate judgments. Case note, 25/02/2021, free
- Lieven J was concerned with an application for indemnity costs, where allegations of conspiracy and fraud had been made but were then withdrawn at the eleventh hour. Case note, 11/01/2021, free
- Cobb J was concerned with interim applications made under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 in respect of a child who was just three weeks old. Case note, 07/12/2020, free